Trends in Insurance Coverage for Complementary Health Care Services

Author: James M Whedon1, Serena Bezdjian1, Justin M Goehl2, Louis A Kazal2
Affiliation:
1 Health Services Research, Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA, USA.
2 Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Conference/Journal: J Altern Complement Med
Date published: 2020 Jul 7
Other: Special Notes: doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0078. , Word Count: 298


Introduction: Complementary health care professionals deliver a substantial component of clinical services in the United States, but insurance coverage for many such services may be inadequate. The objective of this project was to follow up on an earlier single-year study with an evaluation of trends in reimbursement for complementary health care services over a 7-year period. Methods: The authors employed a retrospective serial cross-sectional design to analyze health insurance claims for services provided by licensed acupuncturists, chiropractors, and naturopaths in New Hampshire (NH) from 2011 to 2017. They restricted the analyses to claims in nonemergent outpatient settings for Current Procedural Terminology code 99213, which is one of the most commonly used clinical procedure codes across all specialties. They evaluated by year the likelihood of reimbursement, as compared with primary care physicians as the gold standard. A generalized estimating equation model was used to account for within-person correlations among the separate claim reimbursement indicators for individuals used in the analysis, using an exchangeable working covariance structure among claims for the same individual. Reimbursement was defined as payment >0 dollars. Results: The total number of clinical services claimed was 26,725 for acupuncture, 8317 for naturopathic medicine, 2,539,144 for chiropractic, and 1,860,271 for primary care. Initially, likelihood of reimbursement for naturopathic physicians was higher relative to primary care physicians, but was lower from 2014 onward. Odds of reimbursement for both acupuncture and chiropractic claims remained lower throughout the study period. In 2017, as compared with primary care the likelihood of reimbursement was 77% lower for acupuncturists, 72% lower for chiropractors, and 64% lower for naturopaths. Conclusion: The likelihood of reimbursement for complementary health care services is significantly lower than that for primary care physicians in NH. Lack of insurance coverage may result in reduced patient access to such services.

KEYWORDS: acupuncture; chiropractic; complementary health care; insurance coverage; naturopathic medicine; reimbursement.

PMID: 32640831 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2020.0078

BACK