Author: McKee MD1,2, Nielsen A3, Anderson B1,4, Chuang E1, Connolly M1, Gao Q1, Gil EN1, Lechuga C1,5, Kim M1, Naqvi H6, Kligler B7,8,9
1Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, USA.
2Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, USA.
3Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
4Pacific College of Oriental Medicine, Chicago, USA.
5Institute of Clinical and Translational Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, USA.
6Department of Rehab Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, USA.
7Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, USA. email@example.com.
8Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA. firstname.lastname@example.org.
9Integrative Health Coordinating Center , U.S. Veterans Health Administration, Washington, D.C., USA. email@example.com.
Conference/Journal: J Gen Intern Med.
Date published: 2020 Feb 19
Other: Special Notes: doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05583-6. [Epub ahead of print] , Word Count: 293
BACKGROUND: Acupuncture has been shown to be effective for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal back, neck, and osteoarthritis pain. However, access to acupuncture treatment has been limited in medically underserved and low-income populations.
OBJECTIVE: Acupuncture therapy delivered in groups could reduce cost and expand access. We compared the effectiveness of group versus individual acupuncture for pain and function among ethnically diverse, low-income primary care patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
DESIGN: This was a randomized comparative effectiveness non-inferiority trial in 6 Bronx primary care community health centers. Participants with chronic (> 3 months) back, neck, or osteoarthritis pain were randomly assigned to individual or group acupuncture therapy for 12 weeks.
PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred seventy-nine participants were randomized. Mean age was 54.8 years. 35.3% of participants identified as black and 56.9% identified as Latino. Seventy-six percent were Medicaid insured, 60% reported poor/fair health, and 37% were unable to work due to disability.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants received weekly acupuncture treatment in either group or individual setting for 12 weeks.
MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcome was pain interference on the Brief Pain Inventory at 12 weeks; secondary outcomes were pain severity (BPI), physical and mental well-being (PROMIS-10), and opiate use. Outcome measures were collected at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks.
KEY RESULTS: 37.5% of individual arm and 30.3% in group had > 30% improvement in pain interference (d = 7.2%, 95% CI - 0.6%, 15.1%). Non-inferiority of group acupuncture was not demonstrated for the primary outcome assuming a margin of 10%. In the responder analysis of physical well-being, 63.1% of individual participants and 59.5% of group had clinically important improvement at 12 weeks (d = 3.6%, 95% CI - 4.2%, 11.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Both individual and group acupuncture therapy delivered in primary care settings reduced chronic pain and improved physical function at 12 weeks; non-inferiority of group was not shown.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov # NCT02456727.
KEYWORDS: acupuncture therapy; health disparities; integrative medicine; pain
PMID: 32076985 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05583-6